• Direct Tax
  • Indirect Tax
  • Corporate Law
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans

Categories

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Quick links

  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans
Direct Tax
|
  • Judgements
  • Blogs

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com
+91 97234 00220
Direct Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Indirect Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Corporate Law
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Other Links
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Support
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Delivery Policy
Subscribe to our newsletter


Crafted Mindfully at
© 2025 COUNSELVISE
  1. direct tax
  2. /
  3. judgements
Judges
Appeal Type

Stay Application

Bench
Assessment Year

2012-2013

Result in Favour of

Assessee

PROCTER & GAMBLE HYGIENE AND HEALTH CARE LTD,MUMBAI V. DCIT - 10(3)(2), MUMBAI

SA 128/MUM/2025

2012-2013

Pronouncement Date: 17-10-2025

Result: Assessee

1
Appeal details
RSA Number
[2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 779228 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
2 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Stay Application
Pronouncement Date
17-10-2025
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Allowed
Bench Allotted
J
Next Hearing Date
-
Assessment Year
2012-2013
Appeal Filed On
15-10-2025
Judgement Text
" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SA No. Arising out of ITA No. Assessment Year 128/Mum/2025 1366/Mum/2017 2012-13 129/Mum/2025 6610/Mum/2017 2013-14 130/Mum/2025 7237/Mum/2018 2014-15 131/Mum/2025 7518/Mum/2019 2015-16 Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited 495, P & G Plaza, Cardinal Gracious Road, Chakala, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 099 Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10(3)(2) Mumbai PAN/GIR No. AAACP 6332 M (Applicant) : (Respondent) Applicant by : Shri Ronak Doshi Respondent by : Shri Krishna Kumar (Sr. DR) Date of Hearing : 17.10.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 17.10.2025 O R D E R The captioned applications have been filed by the assessee/applicant seeking extension of stay on recovery of outstanding demand, pertaining to the Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2012-13 to 2015-16. 2. We have heard the parties and perused the materials available on record. It is observed, while considering the initial stay applications filed by the assessee, the Tribunal had granted conditional stay. Thereafter, though, the appeals came up for hearing on multiple occasions, the appeals got adjourned from time to time. The aforesaid facts reveal Printed from counselvise.com 2 SA Nos.128 to 131/Mum/2025 (A.Ys. 2012-13 to 2015-16) Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. vs. DCIT that the cause of non-disposal of the appeals cannot entirely be attributed to the assessee. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, stay granted earlier have been extended from time to time and the last order extending stay was passed on 25.04.2025. There being no change in the facts and circumstances, based on which stay was earlier granted to the assessee and was extended from time to time, we are inclined to extend the stay for a further period of 180 days from the date of this order or till the disposal of the corresponding appeals, whichever is earlier. With the consent of both the parties, the corresponding appeals are fixed for hearing on 30.12.2025. 4. In the result, stay applications are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 17.10.2025 Sd/- Sd/- (Vikram Singh Yadav) (Saktijit Dey) Accountant Member Vice President Mumbai; Dated : 17.10.2025 Roshani, Sr. PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT - concerned 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard File BY ORDER, (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai Printed from counselvise.com "
Judges
Appeal Type

Stay Application

Bench
Assessment Year

2012-2013

Result in Favour of

Assessee

1-to-1

1:1 Consultation on Business Development
dummy

Mahek Shah

₹1

PAID

Memorandum of Understanding - Relevant for Revenue Sharing between Companies
dummyMehul
₹500
Corporate Law (NCLT)
₹4000 for a year

Direct Tax

CAAS Writ Petition: Gujarat HC Questions CBDT on Due Date Extensions and Compliance Gaps
dummy

Team Counselvise - September 26, 2025