• Direct Tax
  • Indirect Tax
  • Corporate Law
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans

Categories

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Quick links

  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans
Direct Tax
|
  • Judgements
  • Blogs

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com
+91 97234 00220
Direct Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Indirect Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Corporate Law
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Other Links
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Support
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Delivery Policy
Subscribe to our newsletter


Crafted Mindfully at
© 2025 COUNSELVISE
  1. direct tax
  2. /
  3. judgements
Judges
Appeal Type

Income Tax Appeal

Bench
Assessment Year

2019-2020

Result in Favour of

Partly Allowed

M/S PARDAYA MEMORIAL TRUST,JAIPUR V. ITO(E), WARD-1, JAIPUR/, JAIPUR

ITA 511/JPR/2025

2019-2020

Pronouncement Date: 10-07-2025

Result: Partly Allowed

6
Appeal details
RSA Number
[2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 706776 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
3 month(s) 11 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
10-07-2025
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Partly Allowed
Bench Allotted
B
Next Hearing Date
-
Assessment Year
2019-2020
Appeal Filed On
29-03-2025
Judgement Text
"vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B-Bench” JAIPUR MkWa- ehBk yky ehuk] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Jh ujsUnz dqekj] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: : DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 511/JPR/2025 fu/kZkj.k o\"kZ@Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust Sant Kutir, Malpura Road Sanganer, Jaipur. cuke Vs. The ITO(E), Ward-1, Jaipur. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAEEP7794A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri P.C. Parwal, C.A. jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Shri Gorav Avasthi, JCIT lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing : 09/07/2025 mn?kks\"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 10/07/2025 vkns'k@ORDER PER: NARINDER KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER . On 04.02.2021, an application u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), submitted by the appellant-applicant to Centralized Processing Centre (in short “CPC”), as regards an intimation as regards the assessment year 2019-20, came to be rejected. 2. Rectification application was rejected due to the following grounds:- “ As per details furnished in the return in schedule part A general other details assessee is registered u/s 12A and has changed during the year the objects/activities on the basis of which registration was granted. Assessee has 2 ITA No. 511/JPR/2025 M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust, Jaipur not furnished details of fresh registration under section 12AA. Hence as per provisions of section 12A(1)(1)(ac) exemption u/s 11 i.e. sr. No. 4(i) and 4viii in schedule part BT is not allowed” 3. Feeling aggrieved by the above said order dated 04.02.2021, passed on the application u/s 154 of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal. The appeal came to be dismissed by Learned CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi vide order dated 09.01.2025. 4. That is how, the assessee is before this Appellate Tribunal. 5. Arguments heard. File perused. Contentions 6. Ld. AR for the appellant has submitted that the reason for rejection of rectification application was that the assessee registered u/s 12A of the Act, was found to have changed its objects/activities during the years, but failed to furnish details of fresh registration. In this regard, Ld. AR has referred to page 7 of the ITR for the assessment year 2019-20, and specifically to serial No. C(i) and (ii)(a), and pointed out that as against the first mentioned column word “yes” came to be typed by mistake, even though there was no change in the objects/activities during the year, on the basis of which approval/registration was granted. 3 ITA No. 511/JPR/2025 M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust, Jaipur As regards the above referred second column, Ld. AR has submitted that since in this column the deed of registration of the applicant trust was mentioned as 01.04.2001, it could be gathered that there was no change in the objects/activities of the trust, and as such, the department was not justified in disallowing exemption u/s 11 i.e. serial No. 4(i) and 4(viii) schedule part B of the ITR. Discussion 7. A perusal of the impugned order passed by Learned CIT(A), record reveals that four notices u/s 250 of the Act, dated 23.01.2024, 25.07.2024, 12.09.2024 and 02.01.2025 were issued to the assessee-appellant. As observed by Learned CIT(A), at page 2 of the impugned order, the assessee-appellant did not submit any response to these four notices. In the course of arguments, Ld. DR for the department has referred to the factum of non compliance with the four notices and submitted that in the given situation, Learned CIT(A) was justified in confirming the order u/s 154 of the Act. Ld. DR has further submitted that neither before CPC nor Learned CIT(A) , the assessee submitted any document to prove to their satisfaction that actually no change in the objects/activities of the Trust had 4 ITA No. 511/JPR/2025 M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust, Jaipur taken place during the year, and that it was only a case of mistake in filling column (i) of serial ‘C’ of the ITR 8. Ld. AR for the appellant admits that no document, including affidavit of the rectification of the trust was submitted before the department or before Learned CIT(A) particularly to satisfy that actually no change had taken place in the objects / activities of the trust during the year, and that in case matter is remitted, the appellant would submit documents to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer on the issue involved. 9. In view of the above discussion, we deem it a fit case to restore the matter to the Assessing Officer for decision afresh after providing an opportunity to the assessee to find out, if any change in the objects/activities, during the financial year 2018-19, took place or it is a case of no change in the objects/activities of the trust, and if so, its effect. Of course, the Assessing Officer shall provide an opportunity to the applicant of being heard to the assessee. Result 10. As a result, this appeal is disposed of, for statistical purposes and the impugned order passed by Learned CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer for decision afresh after providing an opportunity to the assessee to find out, if any change in the 5 ITA No. 511/JPR/2025 M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust, Jaipur objects/activities, during the financial year 2018-19, took place or it is a case of no change in the objects/activities of the trust, and if so, its effect. Having regard to the fact that the assessee-appellant remained non complaint before Learned CIT(A) despite issuance of four notices, we deem it a fit case to impose costs on the appellant trust. Accordingly appellant trust to deposit of costs Rs. 2500/- in “Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The applicant trust to deposit costs and produce receipt before Learned CIT(A) before commencement of the proceedings there, on remand. File be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office. Order pronounced in the open court on 10/07/2025. Sd/- Sd/- ¼ MkWa- ehBk yky ehuk ½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (Dr. M.L. MEENA) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 10 /07/2025 *Santosh vkns'k dh izfrfyfi vxzsf’kr@Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant- M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust, Jaipur. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ITO(e), Ward-1, Jaipur. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. foHkkxh; izfrfuf/k] vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj@DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6 ITA No. 511/JPR/2025 M/s Pardaya Memorial Trust, Jaipur 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File ITA No. 511/JPR/2025) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, lgk;d iathdkj@Asstt. Registrar "
Judges
Appeal Type

Income Tax Appeal

Bench
Assessment Year

2019-2020

Result in Favour of

Partly Allowed

1-to-1

1:1 Consultation with family dentist -Your Smile Deserves the Best Care!
dummy

Dr. Vipasha Shah

₹250

FREE

Early Retirement Letter
₹0
Corporate Law (NCLT)
₹4000 for a year

Direct Tax

AI Hallucination in Court: ITAT Recalls Order Over Fake ChatGPT-Generated Case Laws in Buckeye Trust Tax Dispute
dummy

Team Counselvise - March 20, 2025