"[ 3411 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23573 oF 2024 Between: DEEPANJAN ROY, S/o. TARTT KUIVAR ROy, Aged about 49years, 9ccupqlion.Business Fi./o. Flat No5, Lakshmi Enciavel 34142, Ch, Snivali Marg, T Nagar Chennai 6000'17 , lndia.pAN. AFXPRO234D Assessmerit Year. 202!-21 -Rep by lts SPA Holder Uma Ramachandran D/o. Durga Prasada Rao Aged about 75 Years, Occ. Business R/o. H No. E-9'6, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad, Telangana. AND ...PET|T|ONER 1. ADIT(lNT TAXN)-2.,HYD, Aaykar Bhawan, Opposite Lb Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004 Telanqdna State. 2. T.he Principal Ctrief Commissioner of Incomelax Telangana and A p, Hyderabad, lTTowers, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 500 028, Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned notice dated. o2l04l2oz4for A.Y 2020-21 passed u/s 148A(d) of the Act vide DtN No. |TBA/AST/Fl14BA|2O24- 251106384287 5(1) and the consequential notice u/s 148 dated 02t0412024 vide DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148 112024-2511063843056(i), issued by the JAO(1st respondent) instead of NFAC (FAo-Faceless Assessment Authority),as void, illegal, and contrary to the provisions of Income-tax Act and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. THANNERU CHAITANYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VIJHAY K PUNNA (SENIOR SC FOR ITD) The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA;IESHU/AR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23573 of 2o24 ORDER (per Hon.'ble SP,J) Sri T-CtLartalya Kumar, learned counsel, appears for the ltetitioner ald Sri Vijhay K Punna, learned Senior Stalding Counsel for Income Tax Department, :lppears for the respondents. With the consent frnally heard. 2 3. Learned counsel for the parties fairly and jointly urge that the point involved in this case is squarely covered by order passed by this Court in w.P.No. 13353 of 2024 and batch and it may be allowed of in terms of the said order. 4. In vicu of consensus arrived at, tJ:is Writ Petition is allowed in terms of ordcr p,essed in W.P.No.13353 of 2024 and batch. The direction contained in the said order shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case with full force. No costs. Intcrloc,rtory applications, if a-ny pending, shali also st:Lnd closed SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// - SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 4 3 ADIT(lNT TAIIN)-2.,HYD, Aaykar Bhawan, Opposite Lb Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderacad, Telangana, 500004 Telangana State. The Principal ,3hief Commissioner of Income Tax Telangana and A P, Hyderabad, lT Towers, AC Guards, lt/asab Tank, Hyderabad 500 028, Telangana One CC to Stil. THANNERU CHAITANYA KUIVAR Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SF:I. VIJHAY K PUNNA (SENIOR SC FOR ITD) [OPUC] Two CD Copiers qr 5 KKS GJP re i I I I' HIGH COURT DATED:2910812024 ORDER WP.No.23573 of 2024 ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,41il:j * 1 0 '[^] 2025 l L) t r :r : rlj t ' * co?!aL (r (s^ I t I I I : I i ': "