• Direct Tax
  • Indirect Tax
  • Corporate Law
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans

Categories

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Quick links

  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans
Direct Tax
|
  • Judgements
  • Blogs

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com
+91 97234 00220
Direct Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Indirect Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Corporate Law
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Other Links
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Support
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Delivery Policy
Subscribe to our newsletter


Crafted Mindfully at
© 2026 COUNSELVISE
  1. direct tax
  2. /
  3. judgements
Judges
Appeal Type

Others

Bench
Assessment Year

misc

Result in Favour of

Others

BRIJ MOHAN GOYAL(HUF) V. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

W.P.(C)/7600/2023

misc

Pronouncement Date: 19-01-2026

Result: Others

7
Appeal details
RSA Number
[2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 832395 (HC-DELHI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Others
Pronouncement Date
19-01-2026
Appeal Filed By
Order Result
Bench Allotted
Next Hearing Date
-
Assessment Year
misc
Appeal Filed On
-
Judgement Text
"$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7600/2023 BRIJ MOHAN GOYAL(HUF) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akash Ojha and Ms. Cauvery Rawal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms. Naincy Jain, JSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R % 19.01.2026 1. The present petition challenges the notice dated 29.07.2022 which has been issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the same is clearly time barred in light of judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal [2024] 167 taxmann.com 70 (SC) followed by this Court in the case of Makemytrip India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 16(1) Delhi & Anr. reported in (2025) 173 taxmann.com 497 (Delhi). 3. Ms. Naincy Jain, learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/01/2026 at 13:22:43 Printed from counselvise.com 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering paragraph no. 8 of the judgment in case of Makemytrip India (p.) Ltd (supra), we are of the considered opinion that the impugned notice in the present writ petition is barred by limitation and thus, without jurisdiction. 5. Notice dated 29.07.2022 and any proceeding in furtherance thereof are hereby quashed. 6. The instant petition is, therefore allowed and disposed of in aforesaid terms. DINESH MEHTA, J. VINOD KUMAR, J. JANUARY 19, 2026/MR This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/01/2026 at 13:22:43 Printed from counselvise.com "
Judges
Appeal Type

Others

Bench
Assessment Year

misc

Result in Favour of

Others

1-to-1

1:1 Consultation on FEMA Compliance
dummy

Naman Shrimal

₹1

FREE

Startup Valuation Certificate
₹0
Corporate Law (NCLT)
₹4000 for a year

Direct Tax

Finance Bill, 2026: Key GST Reforms that will Reshape Compliance and Cash Flows
dummy

Team Counselvise - February 03, 2026