" \n \nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI \n \nBEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VP AND SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM \n \nBMA Nos. 13 to 19/Mum/2025 \n(Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23) \nArchana Ajay Mittal \n62-A, Mittal Bhavan-2, \nDr. Gopal Rao Deshmukh Marg, \nMumbai, Cumballa Hill S.O., \nMumbai-400 026 \n \nVs. \nDDIT Inv. 1(3)-FAIU \nRoom No. 416, 4th Floor, \nScindia House, Ballard Estate, \nMumbai-400 001 \nPAN/GIR No. AAGPM 6545 C \n(Appellant) \n: \n(Respondent) \n \nAppellant by \n: \nNone \nRespondent by \n: \nShri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh \n \nDate of Hearing \n: \n21.03.2025 \nDate of Pronouncement \n: \n21.03.2025 \n \nO R D E R \nPer Bench: \n \nThe captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate orders of the \nfirst appellate authority. \n \n2. \nThe assessee has filed an application dated 28.02.2025, seeking permission to \nwithdraw the appeals. The content of the said letter is as under: \nSub: Withdrawal of Appeal fixed for bearing on 14.04.2025 \n \nThis is in reference to the above-mentioned Appellant and on the instructions of our client, we \nhereby state as under- \n \nWe wish to withdraw the above 7 Appeals from A.Y. 2016-17 to AY 2022-23 as these Appeals have \nbeen mistakenly considered as new appeals when we submitted 3 physical copies of the Appeal \nMemo / Brief on 21.02.2025 before the registrar for sake of convenience of the Bench Members \nand the Departmental Representative for the appeals having Appeal No. BMA 42/MUM/2024 for \nAY 2018-19. Appeal No. BMA 43/MUM/2024 for AY 2017-18. Appeal No. BMA 44/MUM/2024 for \nAV 2022-23. Appeal No. BMA 45/MUM/2024 for AY 2016-17. Appeal No. BMA 46/MUM/2024 for \nAY 2019-20. Appeal No. BMA 47/MUM/2024 for AY 2020-21 & Appeal No. HMA 48/MUM/2024 \nfor AY 2021-22. \nE-mail: info@cndindia.com \nThese were the original appeals and were filed electronically on 29.10.2024 and had been fixed \nfor hearing on 31.12.2024. & 17.02.2025 and now adjourned to 14.04.2025. \n\n2 \nBMA Nos. 13 to 19/Mum/2025 \n(A.Ys.2016-17 to 2022-23) \nArchana Ajay Mittal vs. DDIT, Inv. \n \n \n \n \nTherefore, we are writing this letter to clarify that the appeals were already filed online, and \nhearing had begun but the registrar has mistakenly considered our physical brief submissions as \nfresh appeals and fixed for hearing on 14.04.2025 i.e. on the same date. \n \nTherefore, we request you to withdraw these new appeals having Appeal no. BMA 13/MUM/2025 \nto BMA 19/MUM/2025 (i.e.. 7 appeals) and treat the existing appeals BMA 42/MUM/2024 to BMA \n48/MUM/2024 (i.e., 7 appeals) as the final one as it is only a clerical mistake. \n \nWe also request you to treat the 3 copies of brief submitted before your office towards brief of \noriginal appeal. \n \nThanking you, \nYours Truly, \n \nSd/- \n \nChartered Accountants \n \n3. \nThe learned Departmental Representative (ld. DR for short) for the Revenue has no \nobjection to the assessee’s prayer. \nIn view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to dismiss the \nappeals as withdrawn. \n \n4. \nIn the result, all the appeals are dismissed. \nOrder pronounced in the open court on 21.03.2025 \n \n Sd/- \n \n Sd/- \n \n (Vikram Singh Yadav) (Saktijit Dey) \n Accountant Member Vice President \nMumbai; Dated : 21.03.2025 \nRoshani, Sr. PS \nCopy of the Order forwarded to : \n \n1. \nThe Appellant \n2. \nThe Respondent \n3. \nThe CIT(A) \n4. \nCIT - concerned \n5. \nDR, ITAT, Mumbai \n6. \nGuard File \n BY ORDER, \n \n \n(Dy./Asstt. Registrar) \nITAT, Mumbai \n"