• Direct Tax
  • Indirect Tax
  • Corporate Law
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans

Categories

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Quick links

  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Courses
  • Plans
Direct Tax
|
  • Judgements
  • Blogs

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com
+91 97234 00220
Direct Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Indirect Tax
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Corporate Law
  • Judges
  • Assessee
  • Blogs
  • Judgements
Other Links
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • Templates
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Support
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy
  • Delivery Policy
Subscribe to our newsletter


Crafted Mindfully at
© 2026 COUNSELVISE
  1. direct tax
  2. /
  3. judgements
Judges
Appeal Type

Income Tax Appeal

Bench
Assessment Year

misc

Result in Favour of

Assessee

ANITA GOYAL,GWALIOR V. INCOME TAX OFFICR 2(2) GWALIOR, GWALIOR

ITA 623/AGR/2025

misc

Pronouncement Date: 23-01-2026

Result: Assessee

7
Appeal details
RSA Number
[2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 832027 (ITAT-AGRA)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
23 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
23-01-2026
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Allowed
Bench Allotted
SMC
Next Hearing Date
-
Assessment Year
misc
Appeal Filed On
31-12-2025
Judgement Text
"Page | 1 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH “SMC”: AGRA BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 623/AGR/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) Anita Goyal, 426, Tansen Nagar, Gwalior Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Gwalior (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: ACNPG3631L Assessee by : Shri Rajendra Sharma, Adv Shri Manuj Sharma, Adv Revenue by: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 22/01/2026 Date of pronouncement 23/01/2026 O R D E R 1. The appeal in ITA No. 623/AGR/2025 for AY 2011-12, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 11.12.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147/144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 13.12.2018 by the ld Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-3(1), Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’). 2. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the ld NFAC and the evidences filed by the ld AR, I find that the ld NFAC had fixed the date of hearing to submit the details on or before 12.12.25. Hence the assessee is provided time to file the submissions upto 12.12.25. But I find that the ld NFAC without waiting fort eh submissions of the assessee decided the appeal ex parte on 11.12.25 itself without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Further the ld NFAC had not whispered about the additional legal grounds raised by the Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 623/AGR/2025 Anita Goyal Page | 2 assessee before it. The ld NFAC had simply set aside the entire appeal to the file of ld AO. I find that the additional legal grounds go to the root of the matter and are relevant for adjudication of the appeal , which the ld NFAC ought to have disposed of, before resorting to setting aside of the appeal to the file of ld AO. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay, I deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention that the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The ld NFAC is directed to admit the additional legal grounds and dispose of the same in accordance with law in addition to the original and additional grounds raised earlier. With these observations, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 23/01/2026. -Sd/- (M. BALAGANESH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: /01/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi Printed from counselvise.com "
Judges
Appeal Type

Income Tax Appeal

Bench
Assessment Year

misc

Result in Favour of

Assessee

1-to-1

1:1 Consultation on Salary Structuring
dummy

Jeet Mehta

₹1

PAID

Social Media Brand Kit
₹100
Corporate Law (NCLT)
₹4000 for a year

Direct Tax

Finance Bill, 2026: Key GST Reforms that will Reshape Compliance and Cash Flows
dummy

Team Counselvise - February 03, 2026